Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 12:47

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What to know about Jeff Bezos' upcoming Venice wedding — and the protests against it - NPR
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
‘Monster Hunter Wilds’ Collapses With 1% Of Launch Players, 82% Negative Reviews - Forbes
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What is the general opinion of psychologists on Donald Trump's presidency?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
USMNT, messy and meek, unravels quickly for its fourth straight defeat - The Washington Post
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why do people have polyamorous relationships?
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
'28 Years Later' Marketing Hid Mother-Son Tearjerker Due to Studio Worries - Variety
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.